All Men Presumed Guilty
No Evidence Needed To Convict The
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has just unveiled a steaming mess of new laws aimed at criminalising men who pay for sex with trafficked or exploited women.
Ignorance of the girl's background will be no defence for punters, and men who knowingly pay for sex with trafficked women may be charged with
rape. Jan Moir
The idea behind this new law is not to protect 'vulnerable women'. If this
had been the case, then the government could easily introduce a kind of
'licensing system' for prostitutes to ensure that they had not been
'trafficked'. By doing this, men could then see which prostitutes were
legitimately selling their wares.
However, the real idea behind this law is simply to enable the government to prosecute
thousands more men - no matter how innocent they might be - and to have their
faces shoved up into the public domain by the media - even before any court
hearing has taken place.
The aim, as usual, is to demonise all men as much as possible and, of course,
to continue to break down their individual relationships with women - in this particular
case, with prostitutes.
Indeed, the tactic being used is pretty much the same one that the feminists
use time and time again to break down all relationships between
men, women and children.
For example, in much the same way that the feminists like Jacqui Smith cannot
(at the moment) ban prostitution, they are also cannot (at the moment) ban
marriage - and families. So what they do instead is to damage those men who do
engage in prostitution or marriage as much as possible by stacking all the laws
against them so that they can easily be prosecuted (with virtually no evidence
standing against them) for some kind of 'abuse' - simply on the say-so of any
woman.
And even when such prosecutions are not successful, the feminists like Jacqui
Smith and Harriet Harman still 'win', because these laws allow them to demonise
'men' - and to damage the lives of thousands of individual men - via the constant horrible publicity that accusations alone can
bring about.
Indeed, here is a lawyer pointing out that similar laws to the ones currently
being proposed by Jacqui Smith have already failed in Sweden - because they do not appear to have 'protected vulnerable
women'.
...
The latest idea from the Home Secretary is to make it illegal for anyone to pay for sex with a pimp-controlled
prostitute.
This seems to follow the Swedish model, introduced in 1999, when it became illegal to pay for sex, but not to offer sex for sale. This was backed up by harsh punishments for men seeking to pay for sex and long prison terms for pimps.
Although it certainly drove prostitutes off the streets for a period of time, current opinion suggests they have returned, and prostitution thrives secretly in apartments and brothels, which are far less easy to
police.
...
he is wrong to believe that these feminist-inspired
Swedish laws were designed to reduce prostitution in order to protect
'vulnerable women'
But he is wrong to believe that these feminist-inspired Swedish laws were
designed to reduce prostitution in order to protect 'vulnerable women'; because
'protecting vulnerable women' was never what these feminist laws were about.
Feminists couldn't give a damn about 'vulnerable women'. Indeed, without a
continual supply of 'vulnerable women' feminists would lose much of their reason
to exist, and the bulk of their self-serving propaganda would cease to be
effective. As far as feminists are concerned, the more 'vulnerable women', the
better.
(Indeed, the idea that Harriet Harman cares about 'vulnerable women' - having
been responsible for killing, maiming and ruining the lives of
thousands of them
in Iraq - is risible. Similarly, the idea that she cares about 'vulnerable
women' prostitutes when it is she, herself, who has brought thousands of young
women into prostitution - via her continued promotion of family breakdown - is
laughable. Harriet Harman couldn't give a hoot about vulnerable women. Harriet
Harman cares about one person, and one person alone. Herself.)
These new prostitution laws - just like the various other laws to do with
'abuse' (rape, sex-assault etc) - are purposely designed to break
apart as much as possible the relationships between men, women and children.
This is their real aim.
And, in essence, this is how they work.
1. Make any situations wherein men and women relate to each other so
ambiguous - legally speaking - that thousands of men are likely to
find themselves in a position where they can easily be accused of having crossed
some thoroughly ill-defined line.
2. Allow men to be prosecuted for having crossed this line even
when there is no objective evidence that they have done so. Allegations alone
will do.
3. Offer women numerous incentives to make such allegations -
and ensure that those women who make false allegations are
unlikely to suffer any significant consequence.
4. Encourage the media to publicise the names of men against whom any
accusations have been made - and make it a criminal offence to publicise the
names of the accusers.
The aims are as follows.
1. To discourage men from relating too closely to women.
2. To encourage women (and, indeed, men) to see all men as abusers.
3. To encourage women to make accusations of abuse.
And
the basic tactic is to make sure that thousands of men every year have their lives
seriously damaged as a result of having relationships with women even when
they have done absolutely nothing wrong.
(Also see Signing the Sex Consent Document
to get an idea of how these new prostitution laws will be used to prosecute more
innocent men.)
....
Labour MPs Caught Lying About Sex-Trafficking
Plans are afoot
to give greater protection to trafficked prostitutes working in the UK.
But how big is the current problem?
Yep; as usual, Labour MPs are caught lying - yet again! - about
'sex-slavery' in the UK.
According to Labour MP Fiona MacTaggart, all
prostitutes who come from abroad are 'trafficked'.
According to Labour MP Fiona MacTaggart, all
prostitutes who offer sexual services because they need or want money are
'controlled' by third parties.
According to Labour MP Fiona MacTaggart, even though two well-planned
police raids on some 1320 sexual premises in the UK (each containing some
4 or 5 prostitutes) resulted in about 200 prostitutes being 'rescued'
(i.e. about 5% of the total number of prostitutes investigated) the
percentage of prostitutes alleged by her to need 'rescuing' (from their controlling
pimps) is - wait for it! - 80%.
In essence, Fiona MacTaggart and her feminist friends - such as
Harriet Harman - are trying to bamboozle the public into believing that
some 80% of prostitutes are 'sex slaves' whereas, in fact, the evidence
suggests that only some 5% of prostitutes might
be being 'coerced' by others in some way.
Last year, Labour MP Dennis MacShane stated that there were 25,000 women
'sex slaves' in the UK - each catering for some 20 to 30 men every day.
over half a million men in the UK manage to find
themselves a sex slave every
day,
Well, if this is true, then this means that over half a million men in the
UK manage to find themselves a sex slave every
day, but our police force (which, of course, must be useless) could only find about 200
over the course of a huge investigation which lasted for months and which
involved raiding some 1320 premises.
Furthermore, if we take the liberty of assuming that those terrible men
who successfully get hold of 'sex slaves' manage to do so only once per
week, then it follows that over 3.5 million men manage to get hold of 'sex
slaves' every week, whereas the
police, with all their resources, can only find 200.
So, what is going on here?
Well, it is all very simple really.
Denis MacShane and Fiona MacTaggart - together with
most of the left wing politicians and bureaucrats who are
currently in power - are bald-faced liars.
And they are lying to you in order to justify the funding of their various
ever-growing empires, their jobs and their pensions.
Finally, please take note that any
woman who chooses to enter a country
and then who chooses to sell her
sexual services in order to get some money is increasingly regarded by the UN and other
similar agencies as having been 'trafficked'.
So when you hear officials using the word 'trafficked' in connection
with the sex industry, the chances are that they are referring to women
prostitutes who have willingly and voluntarily
entered a country in order to make money from prostitution.
But the officials will be using the word 'trafficked' in order to
deceive you.
|