Vibrators
Women
Are Having Orgasm Problems
I'm feeling mischievous, so here's this! ...
..
Women, apparently, are having difficulty
reaching orgasms these days; with some huge percentage of them failing to
achieve orgasms when engaging in normal sex. And, needless to say, I know why; though, of
course, I, myself, have never come across a woman who cannot
orgasm.
No Sir!
Every single one of my women has writhed and bucked and rodeoed her way to ecstasy whenever I have done my thing. (Of course, I am lying
through my teeth at this point - for effect!)
The secret is to find that little red cotton
bud no matter how hard it tries to hide or to slip away.
You can't feel it. You can't see it. You can't
even hear it. But you know it's there!
You know it's there because if it wasn't there
it wouldn't have a name.
And the secret of sexcess is to chase it round
and round and to freak it out before it dries out.
And therein, of course, lies Catch 22.
Because it's not until the damn thing actually
does dry out that you can locate it and pursue it hither and thither with
any degree of accuracy before it slips away into the dark abyss.
But by then it's too late!
And if you do any zizzing at this point in time
you will have to put up with all that Ouch Youch Oooch nonsense. And, "Oooo, it's
sore."
the real trick to satisfying a woman is to find the
right kind of woman
You see, the real trick to satisfying a woman
is to find the right kind of woman in the first place. The kind that will writhe
and buck and rodeo without too much effort.
It's easy to spot such women because they have a certain look about them.
It's difficult to describe that give-away look
in detail only with words, but the word 'desperate' pretty much sums it up.
And if she looks like Sylvester Stallone, so
much the better, because you will lose interest quickly and, therefore, save yourself many hours of sexual time - which you can
use most fruitfully to get a better education - a couple of degrees perhaps.
But there is an interesting question here.
How come men evolved to orgasm with penile
penetration whereas women did not, eh?
Why?
What was the point?
Well. It is obvious that if men did not orgasm
through penetration then they would not reproduce any of their genes. In fact,
such men would have disappeared. Only men who orgasmed during penetration
produced any offspring!
were women designed to orgasm through the
clitoris
But why were women designed to orgasm through
the clitoris rather than through penetration? After all, not only does its
stimulation not involve penetration, it actually excludes penetration - pretty
much.
What was the evolutionary point of this? How come we ended up with the women that we
got?
And here is a possible answer.
By making women orgasm fully only in the
company of men who gave them a great deal of 'attention' (i.e. those men who
were prepared to fool around with their little red buds - if they could find
them) evolution ensured that
they would stick around only those hominids who appeared most likely to want to
look after them.
And women who did this survived far better than women who did not.
In other words, thanks to natural selection,
the females of our species who currently grace us with their unwholesome
presence were specifically designed not to become ecstatic solely
on the basis of penetration. These thankless hussies were designed to become
ecstatic on the basis of something which requires a great deal of effort and
which, in fact, pretty much excludes penetration at the time.
In other words, their sexual apparatus is mostly excited by a
process that requires men to put an effort into something that does not also
sexually reward themselves.
In other words, the wiring of the scheming brains of
current-day womenfolk has been arranged according to the following heinous
principles.
I orgasm only when the man puts
in sexual effort without rewarding himself.
Therefore, I am only attracted
to the man who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself.
Therefore, I love only the man
who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself.
Therefore, I partner only the
man who puts in sexual effort without rewarding himself.
"Hey Harry. Here's a torch so you can see better and
find my little red bud."
"Oh no. Not that again Woman. I want to go to sleep.
Sleep. Sleep. Sleep. Sleep is what I need."
And when Man was emerging from Apedom, the
proto-women who did not attach themselves to men who put in the extra sexual
effort without rewarding themselves, made the wrong choice!
They cavorted happily with those men who would
abandon them.
they got themselves pregnant by men who had no
real interest in staying around
These were the proto-women who did
orgasm quite happily simply through penetration. They were easily turned on. And
so they easily got themselves pregnant. But, statistically speaking, they got
themselves pregnant by men who had no real interest in staying around. And so their offspring did not survive well.
And so their descendants are not here.
And this is why the women that we ended up
with mostly require all this clitoral stimulation - and all the lovey duvvy stuff.
Their orgasms and, hence, their emotional attachments depend on being
pandered to.
Indeed, generally speaking, the more
'unpleasant' are the experiences that someone 'willingly' wades through in order
to give another an 'orgasm', the more 'under their spell' they must be!
And now, of course, with oodles of western
women available here, there and everywhere, western men do not need to exert too
much effort in order to fulfil their own salacious desires.
And this is why there now seems to be an
epidemic of non-orgasmic women in the west.
The men are not a-pandering.
Well done feminism!
Of course, there is now a variety of gadgets
on the market to help women with their orgasm problems; vibrators being the most
common. But the truth is that these, on their own, are
not hugely satisfying for women even if they do succeed in bringing themselves
to orgasm with them.
vibrators are only useful in providing a MacDonald's
kind of sex.
Good sex - great sex - is, after all, as much
of a mental activity as it is a physical one. And vibrators are only useful in providing a
MacDonald's kind of sex. Yes. Their burgers taste good. But there is a
whole range of tastes that is missing.
And the same sort of thing is true when
vibrators take the place of men.
Generally speaking, the majority of men and
women only have great sex when they 'own' each other in some significant way.
(The word 'own' might not be quite the right word to use, but it's a pretty good
one!)
However, thanks to feminism, this kind of
relationship is being killed off. And so, of course women are
having orgasm problems.
And **THAT'S** what they get for supporting feminism!
Finally, as I pointed out in my piece
Women and Chimps, women are mostly turned on sexually by aggressive,
dominant men.
But men are not allowed to be this way any more.
Men are nowadays always having to tread very carefully, lest they end
up being victims of the endemic plague of false allegations that are made
every year by the million across the western world.
Even their mildest of touches can so easily be portrayed as an act of
abuse, or as a trigger of suspicion that some dark motive is at work.
This, coupled with the fact that 'men' are now very much a hated group
(so often portrayed as mindless animals) has turned them into highly
undesirable beings from a female's orgasm point of view.
And you can thank feminism for that too.
|